The
Truth About Helsinki
I
don’t know exactly who this author is, but his assessment of the
summit appears to be right on to me.
Nevertheless,
what really happened is this: Trump showed the gangster Putin that he
is his own man, that he cannot be bullied by America’s corrupt
political and media establishment into behaving in a certain way,
that he is willing to take those flaming arrows to do what he thinks
is right, which, in this case, is to never forget the lessons of
Iraq.
Keep
in mind that what Trump was supposed to do Monday was to drink the
Kool-Aid, was to believe our Intelligence Community (IC) got it 100
percent right about Russian meddling, was to throw diplomacy out the
window and publicly embarrass Putin.
Thankfully,
Trump refused to do that, and now the spoiled children, just as they
did after Charlottesville, are again lying and claiming Trump “sided
with Putin,” when the only thing Trump’s guilty of is remaining
diplomatic, which is the whole point of a summit expressly arranged
to facilitate peace.
Sure
makes a lot of sense to me @
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/17/nolte-helsinki-is-one-of-trumps-finest-moments/
Brennan’s
Reactions Speaks Loads
And
he [the president] could certainly have remarked that since Brennan
and Clapper both had accused Trump of colluding with the Russians,
and he had done nothing of the kind (as Putin affirmed), and since
there was not a shred of evidence to corroborate that allegation or
Clapper’s claim that the Russians had tipped the election to Trump,
and as both Clapper and Brennan, as well as Comey, had lied to
Congress under oath in related matters, he, President Trump, put more
faith in Putin’s account of the absence of collusion than in the
defamatory allegations of the former leaders of the American
intelligence community. He might even have added that the United
States had interfered countless times in the internal electoral
processes, even primitive ones, of dozens of countries (including
Russia) over many decades, and cautioned against excessive
righteousness.
But,
the president didn’t.
Schumer
Attacks President Trump for Being too Friendly With Putin
Uhg,
Chuckie.
Was
McCain referring to Obama’s meeting with Cuba’s King Raul Castro,
when he spoke of “one of the the most disgraceful performances by
an American president in memory?” @
https://babalublog.com/2018/07/17/was-john-mccain-referring-to-obamas-meeting-with-king-raul-castro/
Man
but I love this headline!!!!!
Why
Rep. Louie Gohmert Is Defending Trump's Comments on Russian Election
Meddling @
http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2018/july/why-rep-louie-gohmert-is-defending-trumps-comments-on-russian-election-meddling
Rep,
Scalise Uses Obama Dirt to Destroy President Trump’s Helsinki
Critics
Good
for him! It’s about time someone in the GOP got over their butthurt
to back the man who holds their fare for the November mid-terms.
Scalise
started with the year 2009, when then-Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton gleefully presented a plastic “reset button” to Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to reset relations with Russia and the
United States, as if the gesture undid all the wrongs Russia
committed against the U.S. and our allies.
Then,
there was March 2012. Obama promised then-Russian President Dmitry
Medvedev that he would have more “flexibility” on missile defense
after being reelected.
During
a presidential debate in 2012, candidate Mitt Romney called Russia
our top geopolitical foe, only to be mocked by Obama — as well as
other Democratic leaders and the media who said Romney’s stance was
“outdated” and “a throwback to the Cold War.”
Then
there was August 2013 when Obama refused to enforce the so-called
“red line” he had drawn with Russia-backed Syria against the use
of chemical weapons.
Less
than a year later, Obama showed his weakness once again when he did
absolutely nothing after Putin annexed the Crimean peninsula.
“June
2017: Senior Obama administration official admits they ‘sort of
choked’ when it came to dealing with Russia. President
@realDonaldTrump won’t choke like President Obama did,” Scalise
wrote.
More
with all sorts of tweets and links @
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/scalise-digs-obama-dirt-uses-it-completely-destroy-trumps-russia-critics/
Limbaugh
On a Tear About Helsinki
I
listened to parts of it and wanted to applaud several times.
Ordered
to stand down over Russian cyberattacks
And
don’t forget Obozo telling the Russian he could be more flexible
after the election.
"We’re
dealing with sheer hatred here," he concluded. "We’re
dealing with sheer hatred for Donald Trump for a lot of reasons and
on a lot of levels. It’s not just enough to say that Trump is hated
because he’s an outsider. That’s clearly an element, but there’s
much more to it than that. It’s deep, and it’s visceral. So what
matters? Words? Placating the media? Are we trying to soften the
coverage here? Do Trump’s actions and his achievements against
Russia not count for anything? And that may be the world we live in:
Reality trumped by words, images, photos."
The
full piece @
https://www.dailywire.com/news/33266/limbaugh-remember-when-obama-did-response-russian-james-barrett
Trump
says Russia to ‘help with North Korea’
What?
Where did this come from? I haven’t seen a peep of it anywhere else
in my news scans.
“Russia
has agreed to help with North Korea, where relationships with us are
very good and the process is moving along,” said Trump on Twitter.
“There is no rush, the sanctions remain! Big benefits and exciting
future for North Korea at end of process!”
At
the same time the tweet was published the RIA news agency reported
that a summit between the leaders of Russia and North Korea is “on
the agenda”.
Can
Congress subpoena Trump’s interpreter?
The
absurdity of the DimocRATs grows larger e3very day. The interpreter?
What the hell are they drinking? But, this is a serious question.
According to this article, the person is not a member of the
executive branch but simply someone hired for a specific purpose –
a tool if you will.
To
get to the title question, can they do that? I’ve been doing some
checking and the short answer seems to be yes. Criminal courts of law
have actually been ordering testimony from interpreters increasingly
in recent years, but this creates a serious dilemma for the
interpreter. Offering such testimony is a violation of one of the
profession’s fundamental guidelines, known as the tenet of
confidentiality. These situations are of such concern that
MasterWord, an industry organization representing language
professionals, has issued guidance on how to respond to subpoenas.
The
bottom line is that compliance with the law and lawful orders of the
courts overrides the professional requirement to adhere to the tenet
of confidentiality, but the interpreters put themselves at risk of
losing future work. They are advised to let their employers know when
a subpoena is received to allow them the opportunity to respond or
object if appropriate.
I
don’t think it’ll happen. As pointed out, a majority of a
Congressional committee would have to issue a subpoena to appear and
the GOP isn’t about to let that happen.
Peter
Srrzok’s Ties to Clinton, Iran, and Saudi Arabia
There
one hell of a lot more to this guy than the media is reporting on.
Taking the time to read this story explains his hatred for President
Trump. His father was another shadowy figure involved in Haiti, Upper
Volta, and other places in Europe and the Middle East.
What
an astonishing story. Right out of the best spy novel.
But
the way, this guy purportedly speaks impeccable Persian.
An
amazing read @
https://gellerreport.com/2018/07/strzok-iran-regime.html/
[Notice
how the media’s hysteria over Helsinki has managed to put all this
into the background?]
Who
Do They Think They Work For?
I
strongly agree with every word of this blog post!
What
was fascinating about Strzok’s behavior and demeanor last week was
his defiant, smug, arrogant, biased, catch-me-if-you-can attitude. It
was almost as if he felt he was protected and above the law, but most
assuredly, he felt he was untouchable and above Congress.
Yet
the FBI, as a division of the Department of Justice, is subject to
the oversight of Congress. Congress established the Justice
Department in 1789—and it could unmake the Justice Department if it
wanted. Congress provides funding that allows the department and the
bureau to operate, and Congress has not only the right to oversee the
actions of the FBI but also the obligation to ensure the bureau acts
within its legal authority. What we saw Thursday was a smug
bureaucrat who clearly has forgotten that in a constitutional
republic, power flows from the people to their duly elected
representatives who are to do the people’s business, which includes
funding—with the people’s tax dollars—the various departments
and agencies, followed by oversight of those departments.
So
when you see Justice Department lawyers and federal agents arrogantly
suggest that Congress go pound sand and wait around for the FBI,
they’re not just telling Congress off: they’re telling the people
off. They’re also communicating that an institution, a creation of
our constitutional government, is greater than the Constitution and
more sovereign than the sovereign people.
There
is more, but that is for me the central point.
Rand
Paul Puts Hillary Clinton on Blast:
She's
the Only Person 'We Actually Know' Colluded With Russians
He
may be leery of the president’s programs but he sure as hell lays
it out like he sees it.
During
an interview with Fox News, Paul was asked to explain why he
supported Trump's actions. He claimed that the Russian investigation
is corrupted by partisan agendas and Democrats who have colluded with
Russia in the past.
“He
sees all these accusations from partisan Democrats, Hillary Clinton,
saying, 'Oh, he colluded with the Russians,'” Paul said. “The
only people who we actually know colluded with the Russians were
Hillary Clinton, who paid a British agent — who then paid Russians
— for information for this dossier.”
Americans
Want Kavanaugh Confirmed to Supreme Court
I
think he will be confirmed with 3 to 5 Dim votes and it’ll happen
before the November elections.
According
to a Gallup poll released Tuesday, 41-percent of respondents want to
see the Senate vote in favor of Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
In
comparison, only 37-percent of respondents wanted to see the Senate
vote against the confirmation. These findings reaffirm those of other
recent polls.
I’ve
noticed FoxNews and other channels have some pretty powerful
commercials indicating he should be confirmed.
Billionaire
George Soros: Obama Was My 'Greatest Disappointment'
Oh
lord did I love reading this. Obozo is globe-trotting, trying to tell
the world how to run things and his puppet master is unhappy with
him. Karma.
Obama
"was someone who was known from the time when he was competing
for the editorship of The Harvard Law Review to take his supporters
for granted and to woo his opponents," Soros told NY Times Mag.
From
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/george-soros-barack-obama-obama-election/2018/07/18/id/872392/
[Must
see] Watch how easy illegal border crossings are
Build
that wall!
Is
The Yellowstone Super Caldera Getting Ready to Blow?
The
sky is falling! The sky is falling!
Seriously,
troubling signs but guesses are that such a major event is far in the
future.
Part
of Grand Teton National Park near Yellowstone supervolcano closed
after massive fissure opens
It’s
a 100 foot crack in the earth.
Sunken
Imperial Russian warship may contain $130 billion in gold
If
we didn’t see figures in the trillions, this would almost be
mind-blowing. A South Korean firm is reported to have found the
wreck.
Here’s
my question. If the gold bullion and coins are in the wreck, who is
going to claim ownership of it? Will Russian make a big effort to
claim it belongs to it?
The
Dmitry Donskoi, a 5,800-ton ironclad cruiser, was in a fleet of 38
Russian Imperial Navy ships deployed from the Baltic to the Pacific.
Citing historical accounts, The Express reports that the Dmitry
Donskoi may be treasure-laden. In addition to carrying port expenses
and salaries for the fleet’s sailors and officers, she may have
held gold reserves of other Russian ships damaged in the Battle of
Tsushima in May 1905.
Why
Not to Buy a Home
In
my lifetime, I’ve only “owned” one home and that’s because my
wife at the time wanted one better than the one she had. My current
wife has been nagging me for 25 years to buy a home and I’ve done
my best to deal with it – we still rent.
Here’s
a financial planners reasons for not buying:
1.
Single family homes are not good investments
2.
There's an opportunity cost to saving (for a down payment) versus
investing
3.
It's harder to manage cash flow as a homeowner, making it difficult
to consistently invest
4.
A house can limit your freedom and flexibility
5.
Renting means getting to live lighter
6.
I'm just not interested [This is me!]
No comments:
Post a Comment